A little over a year ago, the journalist claimed she was innocent.

This A- list journalist works for, and appears on a cable TV business network, every weekday, often multiple times per day.

He is also a columnist for one of the largest newspapers in the largest city in America.

A little over a year ago, during a podcast interview, while the madam/procurer was facing trial, the journalist claimed she was innocent.

The interview billed the journalist as a “Pulitzer Prize winner.” In reality, the journalist was disgraced a decade earlier, for lying on public biographies, that he was a “Pulitzer Prize nominee,” when he was most certainly not.

His then-employer, another large cable business network changed the biography immediately, as did his agent.

Charlie Gasparino
American journalist, blogger, occasional radio host.
He frequently serves as panelist on the Fox Business Network program segment The Cost of Freedom and the stocks/business news program Cashin’ In.

Newspaper: The New York Post

Madam/procurer: Ghislaine Maxwell

His then-employer: CNBC

His Pulitzer nominee claim

Gasparino’s biographical snippets on websites and his own personal statements have occasionally claimed that Gasparino is a Pulitzer Prize nominee. Gasparino was criticized for this by investigative reporter Bill Dedman and others as a misleading claim: while Gasparino was suggested to the Pulitzer Nominating Juries, hundreds of journalists are, and there is no particular esteem in this as anyone can submit anyone else for consideration When people claim to be a Pulitzer nominee, the usual implication is that the Pulitzer Nominating Jury has deemed them a finalist in that year’s competition, which is a prestigious honor, but not one Gasparino attained. Fox Business updated his biography to more precisely say that his work “was submitted for the Pulitzer” rather than being a nominee. – Source