It doesn’t appear that the conglomerate itself issued a directive.

Rather, the take down of videos negative to the alliterate one and her husband are coming from a PR firm/bot farm which sends complaints nonstop asking that the videos be taken down.

The videos are then removed and it is up to the creator to try and get them back online, which rarely ever works unless your videos are making the conglomerate a lot of money.

Meghan Markle

Prince Harry

Harry Accuses Tabloid of Running ‘Gratuitous’ Photos of Meghan and Kids

Prince Harry’s lawyers say a tabloid published “numerous gratuitous photographs” of him, Meghan and their children on a story that also libeled him, a court filing shows.

The Duke of Sussex is suing the Mail on Sunday for damages at the High Court in London over a February exclusive about his dispute with the U.K. government over the removal of his police protection.

A court filing by his lawyers not only accused the newspaper of “distortion and misrepresentation of the facts,” but also commented on the number of pictures in the online version of the article, published by MailOnline.

The document, seen by Newsweek, reads: “The Online Article was published by the Defendant [the Mail] as an ‘Exclusive’ and given huge prominence as the lead story on its home page.
“Further, it included numerous gratuitous photographs of [Prince Harry] and his wife and family.”

The online article contained four images, including three of Meghan and Harry from their days as working royals and one of them with children Archie and Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor taken from their 2022 Christmas card, when accessed by Newsweek on March 22.

It is not retrospectively clear what pictures were used on the home page to accompany the headline and summary of the story.

Harry’s court filings say the Mail on Sunday’s coverage suggested he “lied in his initial public statements to the effect that he had always been willing to pay for police protection in the U.K.” – Source

Read more on these Tags: ,